Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Home / Resources / Transforming a Packaging Failure
Resources
July 31, 2023

Transforming a Packaging Failure

Share

Recently, a PCL client checked in after experiencing a packaging failure in a Tyvek/film pouch.  The failure was consistent in its presentation: pinholes in the corner of the pouches.  At an impasse, the client did not want to waste any more time or money.  It was our turn to get to work.

The Packaging Failure Cause

After replicating the defect, we found that the packaging failure was caused by hazards in the  shipping environment.

Our Two-part Study

We planned a two-part study comparing five new shipping alternatives to the control group.  We were able to start right away, by sourcing materials for the study in just two days.

The first part of the test used a DOE comparing shipping alternatives and the control group. We put the samples through 1.5x ASTM D4169 (Assurance Level 1, Schedules A, F, A).  We ran the samples through a transit simulation. Next, the packages were opened and each pouch was subjected to a bubble leak test to assess sterile barrier integrity. If any failures occurred, then that shipping alternative was eliminated from consideration.

The second part was a confirmation study. This process started with the optimal shipping configuration from the first part of the test, using a sample size of N = 30. The packages were sent through normal transit testing sequences of ASTM D4169 (Assurance Level 1, DC13 Schedules A,F,E,A). After the transit simulation, the packages were opened and the pouches were again subjected to a bubble leak test.  No failures were found. This result confirmed the identified packaging alternative as the best choice.

The Win

After providing material numbers, supplier information and box drawings to the client, their impasse was over and they were ready to forge ahead. By tackling the issue in a single week, we were able to save our client the stress of dealing with ongoing packaging failures; problem solved!

Facing a packaging failure? Contact us or live chat with an engineer. Or request a quote if you are ready.